Asked by: Manpreet Ollesasked in category: General Last Updated: 19th January, 2020
Was the dropping of the atomic bomb justified?
Subsequently, one may also ask, was dropping the atomic bomb necessary?
In this respect, Hiroshima and Nagasaki may have been the first shots of the Cold War as well as the final shots of World War II. Regardless, the United States remains the only nation in the world to have used a nuclear weapon on another nation. Truman stated that his decision to drop the bomb was purely military.
Additionally, was the dropping of the atomic bomb justified conclusion? The dropping of the atomic bombs in Nagasaki and Hiroshima was justified even if it caused damage in the moment. The Japanese were warned by the United States days before being bombed. The told the japanese to surrender, or to evacuate certain areas that could be affected by the bombs that were going to be used.
Also, why was the US justified in dropping atomic bombs?
The United States was justified in dropping an atomic bomb on Japan's, Hiroshima and Nagasaki during the Second World War because it was beneficial to the U.S, retaliation and end the war faster.
What would have happened if the atomic bomb wasn't dropped?
They only surrendered after the Nagasaki bomb was dropped and assumed that the Americans had more bombs to drop. Millions of more people would have died if America had not dropped the bombs, primarily Japanese people. Japan was beginning to starve at the time the bombs were dropped.